Mark 3:19

(Slightly Rephrased)

"And Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed Him."
(Mark 3:19)

The evidential value of what has been written about the apostles will, to some minds, seem overborne by the difficulties which arise at the name of Judas. Yet the fact that Jesus chose him (that awful fact which has offended many) is in harmony with all that we see around us--with the prodigious powers bestowed, in full knowledge of the dark results, upon Napoleon and Voltaire; powers bestowed in, yet given because the issues of human freewill never cancel the trusts imposed on human responsibility. Therefore the issues of the freewill of Judas did not cancel the trust imposed upon his responsibility; and Jesus acted not on His foreknowledge of the future, but on the mighty possibilities for good as for evil which heaved in the bosom of that fated man as he stood upon the mountain meadow.

In the story of Judas, the principles which rule the world are made visible. From Adam to this day men have been trusted who failed and fell, and out of their very downfall, but not by precipitating it, the plans of God have evolved themselves.

It is not possible to make such a study of the character of Judas as of some others of the Twelve. A traitor is naturally taciturn. No word of his draws our attention to the fact that he had gained possession of the bag, even though one who had sat at the receipt of custom might more naturally have become the treasurer. Until St. John explains the source of the general discontent which remonstrated against the waste of ointment, we do not hear Judas' voice above the rest. He is silent even at the feast, despite the words which revealed his guilty secret, until a slow and tardy question is wrung from him: not, "Is it I, Lord?" but, "Rabbi, is it I?" His influence is like that of a subtle poison--not discerned until its effects betray it.

But many words of Jesus acquire new force and energy when we observe that, whatever else their intent may have been, they were plainly calculated to influence and warn Iscariot. Such are the repeated and urgent warnings against covetousness (from the first parable, spoken so shortly after his vocation), which reckons the deceitfulness of riches and the lust of other things among the tares that choke the seed, down to the declaration that they who trust in riches shall hardly enter the kingdom. Such are the denunciations against hypocrisy, spoken openly as in the Sermon on the Mount, or to His own apart as when He warned them of the leaven of the Pharisees which is hypocrisy, that secret vice which was eating out the soul of one among them. Such were the opportunities given to retreat without utter dishonor, as when He said, "Do ye also will to go away? . . . Did I not choose you the Twelve, and one of you is a devil?" (John 6:67, 70). Such also were the awful warnings given of the solemn responsibilities of special privileges--the exalted city which is brought down to hell, the salt which is trodden under foot, the men whose sin remained because they can claim to see, and still more plainly, the first that shall be last, and the man for whom it were good if he had not been born. In many besides the last of these, Judas must have felt himself sternly, because faithfully, dealt with. And the exasperation which always results from rejected warnings, the sense of a presence utterly repugnant to his nature, may have largely contributed to his final and disastrous collapse.

In the life of Judas there was a mysterious impersonation of all the tendencies of godless Judaism, and his dreadful personality seems to express the whole movement of the nation which rejected Christ. We see this in the powerful attraction felt toward Messiah before His aims were understood, in the deadly estrangement and hostility which were kindled by the gentle and self-effacing ways of Jesus, in the treachery of Judas in the garden and the unscrupulous wiliness of the priests accusing Christ before the governor, in the fierce intensity of rage which turned his hands against himself and which destroyed the nation under Titus. The very sordidness which made a bargain for thirty pieces of silver has ever since been a part of the popular conception of the race.

Contemplating this blighted and sinister career, the lesson is burnt in upon the conscience that since Judas fell by transgression, no place in the Church of Christ can render any man secure. Since by falling he was openly exposed, none may flatter himself that the cause of Christ is bound up with his reputation, that the mischief must needs be averted which his downfall would entail, that Providence must needs avert from him the natural penalties of evil-doing. Though one was as the signet upon the Lord's hand, yet was he plucked from that place. There is no security for any soul anywhere except where love and trust repose--upon the bosom of Christ.

Now if this be true, and if sin and scandal may conceivably penetrate even the innermost circle of the chosen, how great an error it is to break the unity of the Church because of these offenses and to institute some new communion far purer than the Churches of Corinth and Galatia--churches which were not abandoned but reformed and more impenetrable to corruption than the little group of those who ate and drank with Jesus.

Return to Chadwick Page

© Copyright 2019 Rediscovering the Bible. All Rights Reserved. | Contact Us | Email Webmaster